1. The people on campus who want him banned are the same people who had previously demanded "free speech" for the founder of the Minute Men, when student protests a while back killed that scheduled event.
2. The people on campus who demand "free speech" for Ahmadinejad are the same people who previously (and successfully) demanded a zipped lip for scheduled Minute Men founder.
Am I the USA's only advocate of free speech? Let both these guys speak. And don't interrupt them, even with long-winded diatribes during the Q and A. Just let 'em speak, ask some real questions, then decide for yourself. And remember: the guy speaking today that you detest makes it possible tomorrow for a speaker that others detest.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81aa9/81aa9a2a92d6d903420cb4ccea5f3d5e5547adf9" alt=""
1 comment:
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8RS0A5O0&show_article=1
Well, the tyrant spoke at Columbia. On stage he got an earful of criticism and tough questions from the university president, and from students during Q&A. How is this wrong?
Post a Comment