The prosecuter in the Joan Bennet Ramsey case has set a fine example for the Duke rape hoax prosecuter. The Ramsey suspect confessed to the crime, but in response to this we never even saw or heard the prosecuter. She quietly set about aquiring DNA and other info, then *after* obtaining information she made a decision. Imagine if she had appeared before the cameras and declared to the world, "We've got our man. The DNA tests will confirm that we have cracked this case."
The same legal TV analysts who have come to view the Duke rape allegation as a hoax also began developing doubts about this Joan Bennet confession. Very interesting that when the Joan Bennet DNA returned negative, the prosecutor dropped the case, and without first declaring that the DNA analysis would "identify the guilty and exonerate the innocent." The Duke rape hoaxer had DNA in her from sex with her boyfriend which occured several days earlier, but zero DNA from the three men she claims raped her without condums just hours earlier. And the alleged crime scene hadn't even bee cleaned by the supposed violent attackers (who had carefully eliminated all evidence of drinking, which was the charge that they feared!) three days later when the police came, and it contained no DNA indicating a violent rape.
2006-08-29
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
krystal: Thank you for your excellent and informative post.
krystal: I have compared the Duke Cracker Boys to the Scottsboro Boys many times in this blog. I agree that it's an apt analogy. Many leftists who would loudly support the Duke accused were they black basketball players (even rich ones from affluent families) and the strippers white are either silent here, or contorting themselves to oppose the players.
krystal: I have compared the Duke Cracker Boys to the Scottsboro Boys many times in this blog. I agree that it's an apt analogy. Many leftists who would loudly support the Duke accused were they black basketball players (even rich ones from affluent families) and the strippers white are either silent here, or contorting themselves to oppose the players.
http://www.slate.com/id/2148546
Excellent deconstruction / demolition of the preposterous NYT "one the one hand, on the other hand" analysis of this perposterously and obviously one-sided case.
Post a Comment