2006-03-01

"Europe is Shuffling into Darkness"

Douglas Murray attends a conference of Islam critics in the Netherlands, and says “We should fear Holland’s silence.”

Holland — with its disproportionately high Muslim population — is the canary in the mine. Its once open society is closing, and Europe is closing slowly behind it. It looks, from Holland, like the twilight of liberalism — not the “liberalism” that is actually libertarianism, but the liberalism that is freedom. Not least freedom of expression.

All across Europe, debate on Islam is being stopped. Italy’s greatest living writer, Oriana Fallaci, soon comes up for trial in her home country, and in Britain the government seems intent on pushing through laws that would make truths about Islam and the conduct of its followers impossible to voice.

Those of us who write and talk on Islam thus get caught between those on our own side who are increasingly keen to prosecute and increasing numbers of militants threatening murder. In this situation, not only is free speech being shut down, but our nation’s security is being compromised.

Since the assassinations of Fortuyn and, in 2004, the film maker Theo van Gogh, numerous public figures in Holland have received death threats and routine intimidation. The heroic Somali-born Dutch MP Ayaan Hirsi Ali and her equally outspoken colleague Geert Wilders live under constant police protection, often forced to sleep on army bases. Even university professors are under protection.

Europe is shuffling into darkness. It is proving incapable of standing up to its enemies, and in an effort to accommodate the peripheral rights of a minority is failing to protect the most basic rights of its own people.

The governments of Europe have been tricked into believing that criticism of a belief is the same thing as criticism of a race. And so it is becoming increasingly difficult and dangerous to criticise a growing and powerful ideology within our midst. It may soon, in addition, be made illegal.

1 comment:

Paul Hue said...

I think that there is only one approach to free speach, and it's the opposite one that works for torture: 100% legal freedom for speach (and 0% for torture). This is very disturbing, but I have some confidence that the hysterical, beserk behavior of the tyranical muslims, combined with the tolerante, even-keeled example of most westerners, will cause a backlash within islam, with intelligent muslims stepping forward bravely.

For the life of me, I can't understand why people like Tom and Nadir don't despise these murderous tyranical confessionists as much as they would murderous tyranical white racists. What is the difference? Tom and Nadir I suppose will say that the muslim tyrants are behaving as they are due to injustices visited upon them by outsiders; but the white racists claimed the same thing as their excuse. Just read any speaches by Hitler for examples. In the 1930s, people like JFK's dad sympathized with Hitler for these types of reasons. Like these muslim tyrants, Hitler demanded speach strictures, and responded with terror to violations. Would Nadir wag a finger of consternation at those who dared "provoke" the Nazis with talk that they deemded "offensive"?

How about the KKKers, and their violent responses to "offensive" comments?