Pay attention. Some of the muslims igniting and fanning the flames of intollerant rage created some of the cartoons in dispute, in order to... ignite and fan those flames. What delights me to no end is that because so many western publications are answering Nadir's call to self-ban the cartoons, most people learn about the cartoons via internet rumors... into which these muslim interlopers have inserted three cartoons (that *they* made, in order to frame the evil infidels), which have become the three most enraging of the cartoons -- though no western publication has printed the three cartoons! How perfect.
Most wonderful is the delima now facing these ignorant, knuckle-dragging crowds: Some of their members created three of the cartoons that they all insist mandates death for the creators and disseminators. What will they do?
Nadir, these are the people you want us to appease?
"The Brussels Journal has always doubted whether the cartoons added by the imams were genuine. Whenever we mentioned them we explicitly wondered whether they were not “of the imam’s own making.” Certain Western mainstream media, however, such as the Australian network SBS and the British BBC authoritatively declared that the pigsnout was one of Jyllands-Posten’s cartoons."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I am especially interested to learn of Nadir's resonse to this. Some of the imam's leading the violent mobs that Nadir says we should appease, are themselves creating and disseminating some of these images, in order to have an excuse for fueling the violent rage that Nadir says we must appease. What do you say now, Nadir?
Muslims are often guilty of un-Islamic behavior. Suicide bombers are the first that come to mind as both suicide and murder are against the religion.
Christians are often guilty of un-Christian behavior as well. Harassment and murder are contrary to the teachings of Jesus too, but that never stopped some folks.
So-called "defenders of liberty" are guilty of undemocratic practices. How can George Bush "bring freedom to Iraq" while trampling on freedom here at home?
How can you guys advocate freedom of speech but approve of Bush's war on those who criticize his regime and his policies?
Nadir: I agree with most of your comments here. I certainly think that Bush has a logical obligation to improve his own adherance to freedom as he promotes freedom abroad. One of the placcards that y'all crazy peace-nicks displayed contained the following declaration from one of your greatest European ancestors, Ben Franklin: "Those who would diminish liberty to advance security desearve neither." I find this to be a very convincing slogan, and exactly expresses why I share your opposition to the Patriot and Homeland Security Acts.
Post a Comment