Nadir: When our friend Calvin was in my salon a couple of weeks ago, two of his main points in favor of the Duke Rape accuser were that (1) the accused left no DNA because they raped her with a beer bottle or broomstick unbeknownst to her; and (2) they called and requested "black" strippers, which showed "premeditation" of something especially horrible.
You and your wife sat on the couch nodding at Calvin's every promulgation. The fifth attendee, Nicole, sat silent, until you guys left, at which point she refuted (1) above. You, Calvin, and your wife have declined my request to confirm that you really believe (1), and transcripts of the accuser's police report as well as the DNA warrent all show that she specified "male members" that lacked condums. Now we have this report, where "Stripper 2" says that the accused requested white strippers and were disappointed that they received blacks strippers.
As I told Calvin that night: "If they requested white strippers, you will say that they are racist, and retalliated by raping one of them. If they requested black strippers, you say that this indicates that they had premeditated rape." So, which is it?
We can't believe anything that Stripper 2 says, since she has changed her story so many times, but if you use that fact (her lying on this matter), then you cast doubt even on the allegation.
If these girls and the DA get away with this, where does this leave the rest of us? If these girls can use the call of racism to pull this off, what becomes to the cry of racism?
5 comments:
I was snoozing when you and Calvin were ranting about this at your house, and I am snoozing now.
I don't know what happened there. No comment.
Will you wake up when this happens to some black guys, perpetrated by a white stripper? Will your sleep now make your job harder then?
http://www.newsday.com/sports/lacrosse/ny-liduke0606,0,384015.story?coll=ny-top-headlines
More comments from "Stripper 2" claiming that the white boys had specified a hispanic and a white girl, which contradicts one assertion made by Calvin in support of his conclusion that the honkeys raped the accuser. Nadir is now on record as uninterested when men get falsely accused of rape.
http://www.herald-sun.com/durham/4-742621.html
Yet more details devistating for the prosecution. It frightens me to imagine what these girls could do if they neatly constructed a sensible, consistent lie that carefully worked its way around the facts. It is possible to construct such a lie.
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/13249625/site/newsweek/
What does the accuser have on the side of her story other than the supporters inventing possible explanations on her behalf?
Post a Comment