Six, I'm going to somewhat disagree with you on this:
1. I think that you shouldn't call Michael Moore names, as we can surely find better reasons for opposing him than his abhorent appearance.
2. I *somewhat* aggree with Moore on this issue. Would we have not been better off had we responded to 911 by *NOT* passing the unfortunately named "Patriot" and "Homeland Security" Acts? I believe that Bush, the supposed Small Govt candidate, responded to 911 with the ultimate Big Govt programs, and with the usual absurd results, such as Nadir's having to remove his ascot and leather vest when flying between Nashville and Provincetown.
5 comments:
Six, I'm going to somewhat disagree with you on this:
1. I think that you shouldn't call Michael Moore names, as we can surely find better reasons for opposing him than his abhorent appearance.
2. I *somewhat* aggree with Moore on this issue. Would we have not been better off had we responded to 911 by *NOT* passing the unfortunately named "Patriot" and "Homeland Security" Acts? I believe that Bush, the supposed Small Govt candidate, responded to 911 with the ultimate Big Govt programs, and with the usual absurd results, such as Nadir's having to remove his ascot and leather vest when flying between Nashville and Provincetown.
"I think that you shouldn't call Michael Moore names, as we can surely find better reasons for opposing him than his abhorent appearance."
Sorry man, he deserves nothing better.
"...with the usual absurd results, such as Nadir's having to remove his ascot and leather vest when flying between Nashville and Provincetown."
Wrong, Paul.
I'll take off my shoes, but I remove the ascot for no one!
I meant to write, "Nadir's dad".
My dad passed away long before 911, but as a non-commissioned military officer, he wouldn't have allowed anyone to remove is ascot either.
Post a Comment