2007-01-04

Duke DA Signaling "Way Out" to Faker?

The Duke Rape DA Nifong has told the press that if the fake accuser, Crystal Magnum, cannot "claim with 100% certainty" that the three accused rich assholes "were the ones" whom she claims assaulted her, he will drop the remaining charges. This commentator wonders: Is he signaling -- via the press -- to her an easy "way out"? This would still let her claim to people bent on believing her (despite all the facts) that "some of those rich bastards" assaulted her but due to the trauma and confusion (and "they all look alike"!) she simply couldn't identify them all with complete certainty. That would leave Nifong to claim that he did the best he could for a poor black girl who got assaulted by some rich white boys.

This commentator also explores the obvious implications for people like Nadir who are "sitting this one out", when doing so leaves them with fewer bullets in their holster when something like this happens to non-wealthy non-honkies.

In a related development, Magnum has now given birth, and even she and Nifong agree that the three accused honkies did not produce the child. After her supposed trauma at their hands, she soon returned to stripping and "escorting", and to making babies. Those facts of course do not prove that she didn't get assaulted, but again: where is any evidence that she was? She is a sick, disturbed person, but not one who holds high government office. Nifong and the "community leaders" who have supported her demented episode are the real culprits.

3 comments:

Krystal said...

Duke Lacrosse Rape Accuser Mentioned No Condoms Were Used
It seems the defense keeps finding more to support their side of things, with each new piece of information they get. Now from that stack of 1,300 papers, they have discovered that the stripper accuser mentioned no condoms were used. No condoms and…
The stripper’s body was completely void of any sign of a sexual assault, the innocent boys were devoid of any scratches, bruising, or marks, and the alleged crime scene was completely devoid of DNA that would be expected in a violent gang rape.

It is impossible that a crime scene with three drunk men in a small enclosed room with a fighting and clawing woman being orally, virginally, and anally penetrated not leave any DNA evidence of urine, blood, vaginal fluid, sweat, fecal matter, scat smears, saliva, tears, or semen... especially if condoms were used. How would they take off the condoms during all this chaos without spilling, smearing, or touching the content inside or outside of the condom?

When investigators questioned the stripper after DNA tests on the semen from multiple men found inside her vagina and rectum didn’t match any of the Duke players on the entire lacrosse team, the stripper admitted to having had sex with at least three men around the time of the alleged rape including her boyfriend and two men who drove her to Duke.
The DA Mike Nifong didn’t talk to the prostitute about her wild claims of gang rape, in which she described in great detail, claiming no finders or any other objects were used to penetrate her, yet Nifong did conspire with the DNA lab owner to hide evidence that proves the three victims of this lie are innocent.

Paul Hue said...

Also, even condoms leave DNA traces, which the labwork did not find. What scares me is: what if she had been intelligent enough to construct plausible lies? She could have claimed that the accused violated her with their fingers. How could you disprove that?

Paul Hue said...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2532140,00.html

Number of non-Duke semen donors = 5 (previously described as "multiple").