Med Results Show NO SEX?

According to this article, the DNA results include a finding of "NO SEX". How does that compare to the original medical finding that confirmed not just sex, but rape? What is going on here? Since when does a DNA test involve such analysis? Does the finding of "no sex" reflect a corresponding second examination of the photos and other evidence collected originally?

1 comment:

Paul Hue said...

Can sweat or other non-seman sources provide DNA proving close-contact? Could this be why the new test supposedly shows "no sex"? Or is that claim of "no sex" false?