2006-04-28

Raped By Three Men... Twice?

This keeps getting better. Ten years ago the accuser filed a report charging three men with gang raping her. Those guys never got charged.
Posted by at

9 comments:

Paul Hue said...

http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/wireStory?id=1900215

The father in one report says that the men in the original three-man gang rape "didn't do anything to her."

7:08 AM
Paul Hue said...

http://www.courttv.com/people/bloom_blog/042706_duke_ap.html

The accuser's story grows more preposterous, but she maintains a sizable base of support amoung:

Racists: Blacks are always right.
Feminists: Women are always right.
Victimists: Anybody claiming to be a victim is always right.

This columnist, a white chick, simply assumes that the Duke laccross and Kobe accusers are correct, and supports her position by erecting rediculous straw men that she easily runs through.

11:49 AM
Paul Hue said...

http://www.wral.com/news/9043360/detail.html

The New Black Panther Party is distributing photos of the accused, with derogatory claims about them. What if the lacrosse supporters -- not one of who materialized prior to the negative DNA tests, by the way! -- responded in kind? All the more reason to shield accuser & accused.

And what will the New Black Panther Party do the next time some black guys get accused or rape by a white woman?

And what is their position on the population of men responsible for about 99% of all reported rapes of black woman: black men?

11:52 AM
Paul Hue said...

http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/04/28/duke.case/

The three guys who gang-raped her 13 years ago (and surely they did, afterall, any accusation this person makes is 100% golden) were... BLACK! What will the New Black Panther Party do about this? Is that gang rape OK since it happened 13 years ago?

11:56 AM
Paul Hue said...

A news report this morning says that the accuser got admitted into a mental program a year ago following a "nervous breakdown" due to overwhelming debt. Jesse Jackson and others have already declared that the accuser is stripping to "survive" and "feed her children" (unlike the dying non-stripper single mother students, who have starving children due to lack of stripping). Since I assume that that this girl is lying, I hope that we learn what this proverbial "madona whore" has been purchasing in her effort to "survive" and "feed her children."

Of course, if she is telling the truth about getting gang-raped (*this* time!), then I don't want her getting pilloried. But since I've concluded that she's lying, nothing's too bad for somebody trying to put innocent people into prison.

12:01 PM
Paul Hue said...

http://www.wral.com/news/9067482/detail.html

The rapists in the case 10 years ago were the girl's boyfriend and his two friends. But we thought -- according to her racist supporters -- that when black men get accused, they get arrested immediatley. We're not talking about 40 guys, and trying to figure out which 3 of the 40 raped her; we're talking about 3 named men. But they didn't get arrested.

The DA in that matter somehow managed to not announce to reporters that the three men were guilty, and area "activists" managed to not go to their homes and bang pots. In fact, in that case the cops told her to go home and write out a chronology of what happened, and the girl seems not to have completed her task.

12:08 PM
Paul Hue said...

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/28/sports/sportsspecial1/28duke.html

Her mom says that the first 3-man gang rape occured; the dad says "they didn't do nothin' to her." And the police question why she filed after three years. The mom says that it involved her boyfriend at the time... which requires asking: the boyfriend that she had at 18 gang-raped her when she was 14?

12:33 PM
Paul Hue said...

According to the press accounts, the original report 10 years ago allege the following claims about that gang rape:

- Three men
- Included beatings.
- Rape went on for an "extended time"

It seems that this go-round she's just repeated her original claims, but applied it to some guys who made an insulting comment (about the broomstick) and then effectively stole her $400 (by not letting her back into the house to get her makeup bag).

3:41 PM
Paul Hue said...

http://abcnews.go.com/US/LegalCenter/story?id=1900472&page=1

I suspect that this accuser, like Tawana Brawly, is a disturbed girl. Nearly every stripper I've ever spoken with frankly has revealed child sexual abuse. I believe that this accuser did get abused at some point, maybe even by the guys that she accused the first time. I have come to believe that it generally takes an early sexual abuse to cause a woman to degrade herself by stripping.

I suspect that this girl has lived erratically and got herself into some trouble that night when the cop said he was going to arrest her. I suspect that she had taken some drugs, and that she wasn't thinking clearly, and that these factors mixed with her anger at the rich white guys who wouldn't let her in their house to retrieve her $400. All those factors combine, and that race card is always laying on the table...

6:12 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)