According to cable news shows, the accuser just remembered how she had "injuries consistent with rape" (but not *only* with rape, the reports continue to forget mentioning) but no biochemical evidence of sex: her attackers only a broomstick, not their anatomical members. Remember that first the DA insisted that the testing would reveal biological indicators identifying the three attackers, indicating his absolute confidence in condom-free rape. When the test results showed no DNA, the idiotic DA started pointing to condum usage, apparently unaware that the tests included negative findings for latex, lubricants, and other evidence of condom usage, leading to a gernal finding of "no biological evidence of sexual intercourse" with anyone.
The new broomstick allegation will fall flat for the reasons above, plus the DA's failure to include such a claim in his formal charges, all of which prove that this is a new "memory" concockted by the accuser to try to fill the emerging holes in her story.
And, as we skeptics have expected, the accuser's friends and family are sending indicators that she's considering backing down, which is probably her best choice. Even the DA has finally broken his recent silence to say that if the accuser backs down, he'll have to drop the case, and not excersize his option to force her to testify; her backing down is the best out for him, too.
I'm now confident that the date rape drug test will return negative.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
http://www.herald-sun.com/durham/4-728348.html
About six of the guys had local outstanding defered cases for petty crimes, and the DA is going to instate the criminal penalties now. This indicates that he's punishing these guys for not helping him press the false rape case, and providing a mechanism for rewarding false incriminating testimony.
I wonder if the DA steered the accuser into fingering the guy with the outstanding assault case in DC, perhaps just informing her of that prior to her fingering.
I predict that the DA will next move against all the players for either underage drinking, or the much more serious criminal offense of providing booze to underage persons.
I am not commenting on any of your Duke rape posts because I have no idea of the facts in this case.
Nadir: That is a very intelligent and unassailable position. Unfortunately, I have ascertained that many people have taken loud, declarative positions on this matter before there was even hardly any facts available at all.
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/sports/14437013.htm
More about her new claim of a broomstick, which appears nowhere in any legal document: three rounds of search warrents, DNA order, and arrest warrents. Also, this claim contradicts the DNA order and the DA's original 100% confidence that the DNA testing would identify the three culprits.
This article recaps the father's indication that the accuser might drop the case.
So now, after the DNA tests, we have the new claims of a broomstick and date rape drug.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12115147/site/newsweek/
"But if the three lacrosse captains who occupy the house had anything to hide, they didn't act like it." The article doesn't mention who meticuously they hid evidence of drinking.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12463693/from/RL.4/
The lineup ID took place three weeks after the incident... an incident now claimed to involve a date rape "forget" drug. During the photo lineup the accuser detailed what each ("100%") fingered guy did... without mentioning a broomstick.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12507128/from/RS.4/
This article has the guys stating that their argument with the strippers involved a dispute over money and the short time of the show, and involved swearing and racial slurs by both sides of the argument. Why doesn't the press quote the alleged racial and gender slurs used by the strippers?
Post a Comment